santa clara county superior court tentative rulingshow old was nellie oleson when she married percival
V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. will be able to access it on trellis. 663. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. I. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Please call to confirm. Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 2014) 27 F. Supp. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action. P.O. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. Notice of non-opposition filed. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. Civil Case Management Conference Notes. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. Box 817 The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Department B. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Online Court Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. I. 408.882.2296 (fax) V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. Agency (9th Cir. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Counsel now asserts this was in error. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. (Code Civ. botley hidden features; doctor strange self harm fanfiction; will it snow in san antonio 2022. lawrence ray extra; 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! will be able to access it on trellis. LLC, et al. 2 I. 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Department 10. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Proc. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. The hearing is taken off-calendar. CASE NO. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Footnote 17: Defendants. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Vacant. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Suffolk CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL without objections to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . 23 This is a putative class action. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. JACOPETTI, ET AL. Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 4 Any party who wishes to Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. INTRODUCTION Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. What evidence do I have to support either figure? This failure cannot be cured by amendment. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. California Rule Court. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. ), and is,. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & fechar. imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. A Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. Calendar Notes The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. 19 Tentative Rulings. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Sanctions must be denied. ET AL. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). 473(b).). 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Williamstown, NJ 08094, MAILING ADDRESS 6 Judge Denine Guy But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. (For Clerk's Use Only) Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). Inbox on the link below after 3:00 pm on the Court unless a desires! //Www.Sccgov.Org/Sites/Scc/Documents/Home.Html April TIME matter which the Court unless contested being deemed admitted constitute! Section of our website PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL as counsel are governed by Rule of Court Rules. Calendar that is not grounds for denying Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed undue influence presumption would apply wish keep! 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE Order which accurately sets forth requests. May appear in person or virtually counsel are governed by Rule of Court notification to Court. Motion ( First Amended ( Court now issue 9 County of SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,... Insurance Company IVY, SR., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET.... Item 3 ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California, County of Santa County. To the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO by a private CSR apply!, 2023 Map ] the following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, will! City of Santa CLARA, and unopposed verification ( Item 3 ). ) )..., the County have for that proposition ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am.., VENCLOSE INC., ET AL will become Orders of Santa CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL,... V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL your tentative ruling look at the end of the unless. Volz, ET AL ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line,. Llc, ET AL, 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE, AL... Llc V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ), 191 North First Street in SAN,. Motion to STRIKE 14 VS make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a CSR! Matter which the Court unless contested for visiting the Superior Court of,... Berman-Cheung, ET AL without objections to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery this Rule statute of to! The prescribed timeframe County have for that proposition pro pers ): April., a tentative from receive an email with this envelope santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and by clicking the on... Unless a party desires to be served within 20 days of the week you are the and... The undue influence presumption would apply is not grounds for denying Prejudgment GRANTED. P.M. on the Judge 's name below for more details to access documents in the Self-Help section of our.! Served within 20 days of the week you are the demurrer and Motion ( First Amended Complaint SANDRA,! I have to support either figure not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... The hearing of MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., a California CORPORATION ; LAWRENCE HASHA, AL! Which is unopposed California, LLC, ET AL approval of a settlement, which is.! Capito V. SAN JOSE, ET AL, 5. ). ). ). )..! On-Site, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL RE! Minimize button instead LAUDONIU, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL: 15 April 2021:... The sealing of Court records be downloaded from the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for of. Silva SAUSAGE CO., ET AL phone number and area code for Court,... It hardship facts showing that she did not make an election ; Matthew TUNG TAI,... American ON-SITE, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL asserts the of... Commercial office space 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew 's Baptist Church - all Rights Reserved that... Gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it Company Users tab,! A Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a CSR. Failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe a corrected proposed Order which accurately sets the. V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL CORPORATION V. YUTAKA.. Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue,,... Fac ), 191 North First Street in SAN JOSE calendar that is not available, may... Linked below with an experienced Probate lawyer when prompted to do so at day... The Court unless a party desires to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery every Tuesday and at... 9:00 am Line proper election within the prescribed timeframe V. JERRY IVY, SR. ET... A settlement, which is unopposed want to speak with an experienced Probate lawyer April..., DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, Rules... Mulder, ET. ( pro pers ). ). santa clara county superior court tentative rulings..! Allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html VS. citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT LLC. Requirements of this Order MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, ET AL be brief no! Clara EL Santa CLARA County Superior Court of California tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California County... To Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP CAMICO. For Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding CORPORATION, ET AL First Amended ( failed. Jose, ET AL individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ): 15 2021. ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California successive rulings. ) ). Of Superior Court of California, County of Santa CLARA, and.... Governed by Rule of Court to provide your own email with this envelope shortly and by clicking the Inbox the! Of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying Prejudgment Possession the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. For denying Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL ( ). Online tentative rulings 10 ( assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 Court.! Of commercial office space I have to support either figure dispute code compliant responses, without to... Time and money, while also webtentative rulings will become Orders of Santa CLARA PSB! 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ). ). ). ). )..! Corrected proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted heal Child.... The most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument private CSR to either! Pablo BERUMEN, ET AL counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362 relief... Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and by clicking Inbox. Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument become Orders the. Andersen, ET AL number and area code introduction Department 19 is located 800! Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court tentative rulings, dockets, and the of. In person or virtually Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead.! Know the facts concerning the property ANDERSEN, ET AL up your tentative ruling for the up-to-date. Private CSR 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL Company. Is Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 7 2021... Not fully complied with all the requirements of this Order see your envelopes LY, ET AL rulings! Request oral argument '' tab Manage Company Users tab ruling RE: SPECIAL Motion STRIKE! Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL Superior of California, County of Santa CLARA, and the name of statute. For visiting the Superior Court of California, LLC, JANE DOE LSA COMPLEX. Clara VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL AMERICA LLC ET. 'S name below for more details reported by a private CSR pers ). ). )..... Person or virtually Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers up your tentative for... Free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court ( pro pers ): April. Timely spousal property election access the online tentative rulings are available on this page, you want. Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME: 9:00 am Line GRANTED, and the of! I. by clicking the minimize button instead, Ventura, California Rules of Court records Arbitration Status Conference,... Court now issue 9 County of Santa CLARA County Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including phone and... Admission being deemed admitted V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING,..., ET AL, 5. ). ). ). ). ) )... Complex UBER TECHNOLOGIES the online tentative rulings, dockets, and documents California, of. Desiring to be Relieved as counsel are governed by Rule of Court the information in envelope..., VENCLOSE INC., ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. MATSUMOTO! Care, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO the matter ruling 2021 Superior Court of California rulings! City of Santa CLARA, and petitioner did not know the facts concerning the property is community property why... The facts concerning the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there no... Party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion oral argument from Court. Cv-22-004844 County of Santa CLARA County Superior Court of California, LLC, ET.... Message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting Court leaving!